Search in Google Scholarīrown, G., and G. “The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?” Journal of Social Issues 55: 429–444. “In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 86: 307–324. “Elevated threat levels and decreased expectations: How democracy handles terrorist threats.” Poetics 41: 650–669. “Topic and trend detection in text collections using latent dirichlet allocation.” In European Conference on Information Retrieval, 776–780.
“Latent dirichlet allocation.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 3: 993–1022. The Economist – 2018 Worldwide Brand Report. Search in Google ScholarĪudit Bureau of Circulations Report. “On smoothing and inference for topic models.” In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, 27–34. “On finding the natural number of topics with latent dirichlet allocation: Some observations.” In Pacific-Asia conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 391–402. “Online new event detection and tracking.” In Proceedings of SIGIR ’98 Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, 37–45.
“Topic detection and tracking pilot study final report.” In Proceedings of DARPA Broadcast News Transcription and Understanding Workshop, 94–218. “Representing topics using images.” In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 158–167. Search in Google ScholarĪletras, N., and M. “Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 4: 157–173. All the authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.Īberson, C. The work also tentatively explores the relationship between the media agenda and events.Ĭompeting interests: All the authors state that there is no conflict of interest. It discusses the hot or increasing trends using regression coefficient.
The work analyzes interpretability, overall weight distributions, and historical changing patterns of the topics using LDA model diagnostics. The retrieved documents for generating topics are divided into three countries of the UK, the US, and China in order to observe topical differences between these ingroup or outgroup countries in The Economist coverage. The data for building LDA model in this work is based on 38,124 articles published from 1991 through 2016 in one of the world’s most influential political and economic magazines, The Economist. This work intends to analyze and compare the topics automatically generated by Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). New topic modeling technique has been increasingly used in research of communication for quick discovery of latent topics that are spread across huge volumes of text.
0 kommentar(er)
